Timo Sirainen schrieb am 21.07.2008 02:03:
But most people haven't needed it, so it would be unnecessary extra checks for them. Wonder if it'd be better to just let them have the extra check or add a configuration option..
I'm also a bit worried that if this check was always done it would break some existing setup where the check doesn't work correctly for some reason.
I see the point :-)
./src/plugins/quota/quota.c:
Looking over the new function 'quota_root_is_visible' let's me think, that Grandy Fu's original solution (*) should work then, because 'noenforcing' does cover not only quota checking but also quota root reporting. So 'noenforcing' is then just an alias for 'hidden'. Right?
So the meaning will change from dovecot-1.1.1: 'noenforcing' => report, but don't enforce to dovecot-1.1.2: 'noenforcing' => don't report and don't enforce
Or do I miss something?
(*) plugin { quota = fs:INBOX:mount=/var/mail quota2 = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h1 }
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Ralf Becker Rechenzentrum (r/ft) der FH Trier (Network|Mail|Web|Firewall) University of applied sciences Administrator Schneidershof, D-54293 Trier
Mail: beckerr@fh-trier.de Fon: +49 651 8103 499
Web: http://www.fh-trier.de/~beckerr Fax: +49 651 8103 214PubKey: http://www.fh-trier.de/~beckerr Crypto: GnuPG, S/MIME
Wenn Gott gewollt haette, dass E-Mail in HTML geschrieben wuerden, endeten Gebete traditionell mit </amen>. (Tom Listen)