Dick Middleton wrote:
Hi,
This topic has been discussed before e.g:<snip />
Cherokee supports the clean and standard method of dealing with this issue called Server Name Indication (SNI) that sends the name of the virtual host during the TLS negotiation.
<snip/>
If Cherokee can do it why not dovecot? Is this something that is, or could be, being considered? It does assume that TB3 and other mail clients support SNI but whatever, I suspect that once TB3 is released the subject will pop-up more frequently.
I'm curious to know the latest thinking.
Dick
From the "Dovecot SSL Limitations" thread last week: Timo Sirainen wrote: On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:32 PM, AllenJB wrote:
Possibly off-topic from what the OP wants, but couldn't TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) be used to overcome the single server certificate limitation?
With Dovecot v2.0 and living in theoretical land, sure.