On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
It's RFC recommended practice, see RFC 3834:
I know. Just for this I re-calcalculated my email address stats.
There is a SHOULD two times. I have replied on this somewhen in the past already. My email domain can be written in 488 ways plus some wicked others. Now add the 87 aliases I have, minus some list-specific plus some others.
This is not the case for the general user, so in general the advice is useful, and avoids a lot of useles backscatter and mailing list pollution.
Yes I am "able to specify a set of addresses to the responder which it will recognize as valid for that recipient."
Yes, you can call this a mis-configuration, it won't bug me.
Feel free to hack away the limitation in the code. You're not braking any laws by doing so. ;-)
Geert-- Geert Hendrickx -=- ghen@telenet.be -=- PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!