-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Troy Engel wrote:
Dan Price wrote:
I agree except for my aformentioned concerns: if 1.0.1 is a bugfix release for 1.0, great. But I'd not like 1.0.1 to be chock full of new features which could introduce instability.
I'd like to see a risk managed, bug-fix-only 1.0.x train and a less stable 1.1 or 2.x train.
I concur with Dan, 1.0.x bugfix + 1.1 devel. Stability is more key to us rather than new features - if it wasn't for the namespace needs I'd probably be using 0.99 as that's what's in the RHEL release.
I would add: Once 1.0.x is released, and new development is occuring in 1.1.x (or whatever), *please* continue to support 1.0.x for bugfixes.
The current situation is that all but the very very latest distros ship 0.99.x, and nobody can get any support for this because 1.0rc* is around. This is a very bad situation, because the whole point of using a distro that contains the app you want is so that you don't have to build custom versions from source, or install RPMs/whatever from a source outside your distro. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF0zX3hk3bo0lNTrURAgayAJ9SvEJV7HhAvgKwvmz6os3Fb9qTpwCgsvQR DK2FUzfr8bObegIKrRBjXe0= =XvnB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----