Dear Thomas, You do seem to have some computing power. I think that does help. Thanks Kevin A.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Thomas Leuxner tlx@leuxner.net wrote:
- Peter Hodur petehodur@gmail.com 2015.01.29 05:25:
With a current version of Dovecot a search is pretty fast _without_ using external indexes. I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 messages in it, and searching the full view only takes 2.5 seconds:
hmmm, could you please tell me more about your setup? What storage format do you use? Maildir or? What is the cumulative size of your messages?
Although the question was not formatted/quoted correctly I guess it is more towards myself as it explicitely speaks of a non-FTS setup:
$ dmesg | grep smpboot [ 0.000000] smpboot: Allowing 64 CPUs, 56 hotplug CPUs [ 0.148600] smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz (fam: 06, model: 3c, stepping: 03) [ 0.300030] smpboot: Total of 8 processors activated (52677.72 BogoMIPS)
The volume providing the mail root is using ext4 on an MD mirror (with CRYPT and LVM overhead):
$ lsblk [...] └─sda3 8:3 0 ... 0 part └─md2 9:2 0 ... 0 raid1 └─crypt1 (dm-0) 253:0 0 ... 0 crypt └─vg0-vmail (dm-11) 253:11 0 ... 0 lvm /var/vmail
$ doveconf -n | head -3 # 2.2.15 (7557234ac0f4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.6 # OS: Linux 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.8
I'm using unspectacular 7,200rpm SATA drives and mdbox.