Hi Volker!
This is what I wanted to avoid with my question. I reported my script with only three word just to make an example but my list is quite longer than this. Let's suppose a list of 30 or 40 words... 30 or 40 rules? Possible but very unconfortable to manage. A more compact version of the script could be this:
-- the script begins ------------
require ["fileinto", "imap4flags", "editheader", "body", "vnd.dovecot.debug"];
if anyof (
body :text :contains [
"crypto", "sex", "viagra"
])
{ setflag "\\Seen"; addheader :last "X-Sieve-Filtered" "blocked words in message body"; fileinto "INBOX.Spam"; debug_log "Body contains blocked word: <the matching word>"; }
-- the script ends --------------
This is simpler to maintain if you have a long list of word. And here comes my previous question: it would be great if there is a way to log the matching word in order to know what word in that list was the "culprit".
Lukas
----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Volker Wysk" <post@volker-wysk.de> A: "dovecot" <dovecot@dovecot.org> Inviato: Sabato, 30 giugno 2018 12:14:11 Oggetto: Re: How to log a Sieve match in Dovecot debug_log
Am Samstag, 30. Juni 2018, 11:28:43 CEST schrieb Lukas:
Hi everybody!
I manage a mail server running Dovecot 2.2.21 with Pigeonhole 0.4.10. I successfully configured sieve and use it also to filter some spam messages. Here is one of the script I use to filter messages on the basis of prohibited words in message body.
As you can see, the last command writes to the log the action of this script.
-- the script begins ------------
require ["fileinto", "imap4flags", "editheader", "body", "vnd.dovecot.debug"];
if anyof (
body :text :contains "crypto", body :text :contains "sex", body :text :contains "viagra" )
{ setflag "\\Seen"; addheader :last "X-Sieve-Filtered" "blocked words in message body"; fileinto "INBOX.Spam"; debug_log "Body contains blocked word: <the matching word>"; }
-- the script ends --------------
MY QUESTION: is there a way to have also the result of the match in that log message? I mean, is it possible to have that "<the matching word>" substituted with the exact word that matched one of the conditions (more or less the same way it is possible using Exim's System Filter)? I googled and searched a lot Dovecot documentation but wasn't able to find a definite YES or NO to this question.
You could make a separate rule for each of the words which should be blocked...
Volker