9 Jun
2005
9 Jun
'05
1:17 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:02:39PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:19:31PM +0000, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
1.0-stables don't handle them well yet.
Why provide the 'mail_save_crlf' option then ? Granted it's there for performance sake, but can I conclude from what you're saying that it should not be triggered to 'yes' (which is not my case by the way) in 1.0-stables ?
-- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur hummel@pasteur.fr | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau