16 Jan
2013
16 Jan
'13
7:17 a.m.
On 15.1.2013, at 21.05, Dave McGuire mcguire@neurotica.com wrote:
On 01/15/2013 01:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
NOTE: The squat code is quite slow for large mailboxes. There are also a few bugs that are unlikely to be fixed. In v2.1+ it's recommended to use fts-lucene instead.
I'm running 2.1 and have just set up fts_solr. Should I scrap that and move to Lucene?
No, Solr is even better.