On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 03:13:11PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes. hidden=no, list=yes configuration breaks the "list doesn't cross namespace boundaries". That's why I said it's arguably wrong to use such configuration.
I do understand why we don't want to break namespaces boudaries. But I don't understand why hidden=no, list=yes breaks it. I must have a wrong understanding of the list=yes semantic.
I thought that hidden=no would provide no means for the client to know about the namespace and that list=yes would allow to list mailboxes in the namespace only if we somehow know the name of the namespace and specify it in the list command.
You seem to imply that a client who would do list "" * would list the mailboxes of all namespaces configured with list=yes. I thought it would list only the default namespace mailboxes.
-- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel@pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau