23 Jan
                
                    2010
                
            
            
                23 Jan
                
                '10
                
            
            
            
        
    
                1:04 p.m.
            
        On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:42 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
c) Prefer to put user's connections to same process, but don't require it.
This + async io as described in my other recent "plan" mail should make it possible to handle hundreds of connections in a process without I/O waits. And combined with imap-idle processes, there could be just 10 or so imap processes always running and handling thousands of connections, with disk I/O being the only bottleneck :)