Hi,
hi,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Timo Sirainen tss@iki.fi wrote:
It's just not possible, because it doesn't support substring searches. But then again, perhaps no one cares. It's not like gmail's search is IMAP compliant either.
if the goal is fast, indexed FTS of dovecot IMAP stores from within a MUA, is fts_solr even helpful? or is it targeted for web interfaces to search ... ?
You can add the break-imap-search option and it'll be helpful with
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:41:36 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote: those
MUAs that use IMAP SEARCH command (Thunderbird I think, but not Apple Mail or Outlook).
Ok, clear. So, from a MUA perspective ... *IS* fts_solr faster/better/cheaper/whatever than fts_squat?
It _seems_ that squat is fast, _does_ substring searches, and _is_ under your control in dovecot. Life seems simpler, but just as functional, with "just squat".
I'm clearly missing or misunderstanding the "solr advantage" ...
Cross-referencing http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-September/042904.html
So when you have a huge amount of folders (like we do... there are users with >10000 folders), Solr could have a big advantage through the single index.
Patrick.
-- STAR Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. http://www.star-group.net/ Phone: +86 (21) 3462 7688 x 826 Fax: +86 (21) 3462 7779
PGP key: E883A005 https://stshacom1.star-china.net/keys/patrick_nagel.asc Fingerprint: E09A D65E 855F B334 E5C3 5386 EF23 20FC E883 A005