On 5/14/2008, Peter Eriksson (peter@ifm.liu.se) wrote:
I hope the performance is better since 1.0's performance (on our system) is really bad (so bad that some of my users have been complaining since it feels more sluggish than the older UW-Imap-based system (which granted had it mail spool on local disks). Another thing I'm thinking about is going back to have the mail spool on local disks but I'd rather avoid that if I can.
then something is not right in your setup, becasue dovecots performance is much better than courier-iamp or UW...
How many times do I have to ask for dovecot -n output?? That might point to where your config is fubared and causing your performance problems - but it is most likely a configuration issue related to NFS...
Just try 1.1 - I think you'll just end up asking yourself why you waited so long...
;)
--
Best regards,
Charles