23 Jun
2003
23 Jun
'03
7:57 p.m.
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 12:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 19:40, Jeremy Katz wrote:
It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service name not be imap. Especially as the same service name is used for pop as well :)
I could change it to use imap for imap and pop3 for pop3.
My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead. Any other opinions?
Well, I'm not really against that either.
how about have dovecot-imap and dovecot-pop
just in case we want different auth mechanism for each.
-sv