jesus! learn to use precedence

On 11/26/14, Harry Mills harry@opendium.com wrote:

Hi,

I have an issue with a vacation message in a sieve script. I can't see an error in the script itself.

Pigeonhole version: 0.4.2-32 Dovecot Version: 2.2.10

The script was created by Ingo (part of the Horde suite), but I think the script is fine. The problem is that when a message is sent to the "everyone" group (and alias for every person in the organisation), vacation messages are being sent back which I believe is an error.

The script is:

=============================================== # Sieve Filter # Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/apps/ingo/) (11/11/14, 5:20:06 pm GMT) require ["vacation", "regex", "fileinto"]; # Vacation if allof ( not exists "list-help", not exists "list-unsubscribe", not exists "list-subscribe", not exists "list-owner", not exists "list-post", not exists "list-archive", not exists "list-id", not exists "Mailing-List", not header :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :is "Precedence" ["list", "bulk", "junk"], not header :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :matches "To" "Multiple recipients of*" ) { if header :regex "Received" "^.*(2014) (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" { if header :regex "Received" "^.*(Nov) (\\(.*\\) )?.... (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" { if header :regex "Received" "^.*(13|14|15|16|17|18) (\\(.*\\) )?... (\\(.*\\) )?.... (\\(.*\\) )?..:..:.. (\\(.*\\) )?((\\+|\\-)[[:digit:]]{4}|.{1,5})( \\(.*\\))?$" { vacation :days 7 :addresses "user2" :subject "Out of office" "IMPORTANT MESSAGE^M THE MESSAGE "; } } } }

The user "User2" sent a vacation message back to the sender "user@example.com" in response to this message (headers only):

=============================================== Return-path: User@example.com Envelope-to: everyone@example.com Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:16 +0000 Received: from tunis.Exampledomain.local ([192.168.254.107] helo=Tunis) by mail.example.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from User@example.com) id 1XowwM-0007Qw-Cj for everyone@example.com; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:10 +0000 From: "User" User@example.com To: "Everyone at Example" everyone@example.com Subject: Electrician Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:08:10 -0000 Organization: Example Consultancy Message-ID: 02e601cfff5c$051ec350$0f5c49f0$@example.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02E7_01CFFF5C.051FD4C0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac//W17ujWbs6KgRRsOZFc7+qT45Tg== Content-Language: en-gb X-Spam-Note: SpamAssassin run bypassed - sent from local address

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

===============================================

I have checked RFC 5230 section 4.5 which states:

"Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or
"Resent-Bcc" line of the original message.

I cannot see the address for "user2@example.com" in any of those fields, or indeed referenced anywhere in the email. Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something?

Harry

Harry Mills Tel: 01749 812100 Managing Director Mob: 07815 848818 Opendium Ltd. www.opendium.com