On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Timo Sirainen tss@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 16:04 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
The gotcha is that you have two completely independent quotas with independent usage/limits for the INBOX and Archive namespaces. If that is what you want, it should all be fine.
Nope, that's totally fine. The idea is to put Archive on cheaper (slower) storage and then grant more generous quotas there to make it worth their while to use, without slowing down their Inbox. Another application would be to put their Spam in another namespace (for people who choose to have it put in a separate folder) with a lower quota, again to offload it onto cheaper storage, since hardly anyone actually looks at it.
Should be fine then.
Or is this something that I could be doing more transparently in 2.1 with imapc?
I don't really see how that could help.
Ah, bummer. I thought maybe 2.1 could proxy to a separate folder or namespace (but I've also barely had a chance to look at it), like so certain folders would be grabbed from a proxy. Haven't really thought that through though :)