27 Feb
2008
27 Feb
'08
11:35 p.m.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or INSTALL or including the patches with the distribution might be more agreeable.
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions?
As an observer, I'd like to remark that it's amazing that twentiety-century known-broken non-releases http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html of GCC are in use in 2008.
I'm honestly curious what keeps you guys on them.
-- Asheesh.
-- Maybe you can't buy happiness, but these days you can certainly charge it.