On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner stan@hardwarefreak.comwrote:
Nick Edwards put forth on 1/29/2011 7:14 PM:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Stan Hoeppner
Nick Edwards put forth on 1/28/2011 9:47 PM:
xfs is not very nice to you if you lose power, it's not as bad as it used to be, but it still gives you 0 byte files, so make sure you have a good UPS to issue a safe shutdown of the server, if you do, xfs is better, using CentOS.
It would be nice if you spoke from experience or documentation instead of rumor.
I do speak from experience, it is also a /very/ well known fact, for someone who rants on and on and on with self justification, you sure don't actually know a lot do you.
It's interesting that you cut the "fact" out of my reply, then proceeded to rant
its interesting you still have not accepted the facts, but rather rely on an FAQ
HINT: not all bugs are ironed out
but its even more interesting that I bothered to read your rantings, at least until I got to the part you already said, and cut out some bits? Do you like hearing yourself rant? If its irrelevant to what I have to say, than I cut it, just like everyone else does all the time.
Second hint: you might enjoy wasting everyones time with 5 pages of blah blah blah and your tiring rants, but we have better things to do with our time, and from many private replies I've had, no less than six, yes, six other people took the time to email me in private agreeing, christ knows how many also agree but did not bother to comment on it.
Please stop quoting stuff if you, yourself have no direct experience with, get with it, some people still see these problems, just because you don't, does NOT mean it DOES NOT still exist. people are sick of of your multi page rants trying to make self out to be some sort of important expert that you clearly are not.
I do not know how to make it any clearer to you, perhaps you should go ask the 8yo next door.
do not waste my time again.