On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:50:39 -0700 Kui Zhang articulated:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Charles Marcus CMarcus@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2011-09-27 2:06 PM, Ed W lists@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 20/09/2011 03:10, Kui Zhang wrote:
thunderbird does not really work for us, due to amount of emails per mailbox. It was hogging all the memory + cpu.
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it should start running fairly decently?
Also - Outlook is by far much slower than Thunderbird in my experience...
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it should start running fairly decently?
I had indexing disabled... that did not help much.
TB work better after I have these settings...
mail.imap.expunge_after_delete true mail.imap.expunge_option 2 mail.server.default.autosync_offline_stores false mail.server.default.offline_download false mail.server.default.autosync_max_age_days 14
I think mail.imap.expunge_after_delete might have caused mdbox limit problem I had before... but not confirmed.
Also - Outlook is by far much slower than Thunderbird in my experience...
Multiple people in the office report outlook is faster (when it works).
I have always found Outlook to be much faster than TB. In any case, Outlook 2007 is an old version. I am using the 2010 version at work and it is a much more polished application than the 2010 version and far superior to TB.
-- Jerry ✌ Dovecot.user@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.