23 Jun
2003
23 Jun
'03
7:48 p.m.
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 19:40, Jeremy Katz wrote:
It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service name not be imap. Especially as the same service name is used for pop as well :)
I could change it to use imap for imap and pop3 for pop3.
My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead. Any other opinions?
Well, I'm not really against that either.