9 Aug
2004
9 Aug
'04
2:03 a.m.
On 8.8.2004, at 13:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Support for PAM
I'm not sure how exactly this would work. LDA doesn't use any passwords, so it would have to make a PAM call with some dummy password. And that would create a two second delay with most PAM implementations.
Maybe I am all wrong here (you are all so clever on this list), but isn't PAM divided into 4 different areas exactly for the purpose of using only some of them?
Oh, right, I didn't think of it that way. I haven't done much with PAM myself.
Anyway, I'm still hoping someone else to do the LDA so I don't have to worry about it.