j
k
j a
j l
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 16:00 -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
So that is just as clean as the inefficient way, and more efficient than the "-print0 | xargs -0" way.
I stand corrected. I wasn't familiar with this syntax. My apologies.
Richard
Attachments:
Back to the thread
Back to the list