[ Reply-To set: let's not make this another pointless thread ]
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:37:10PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.10.2013 15:30, schrieb Charles Marcus:
Thanks Steffen...
I kill-filed Reindl a while back due to his abusive, arrogant nature...
what was absusive in this thread?
I think you misunderstand. Charles was actually paying you a partial compliment. He was not saying that your response was abusive. He was saying that you actually seem to have a clue most of the time.
FWIW I agree on both counts. You tend to get abusive sometimes, but your technical accuracy is very good.
and the abusive reply to you in the following thread was well deserved after your "prove it" http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/088587.html
The idea that abuse is "well deserved" could be the origin of your difficulty in fitting in with online technical communities. There's really nothing worth getting angry over. If I think someone has been rude to me, my best response is no response.
I haven't seen that from you. You never let anything pass. You'll probably ignore my Reply-To: header and reply to this.
Too bad - I held off for a long time, because he does actually seem to have a clue most of the time.
because i read docs, not only for dovecot, for a lot of other server software far away from mail and the underlying RFC's too
Yes, that is obvious. You have a lot to contribute. Too bad we can only get that at a price that many posters consider too high.
Sincere best wishes to you. EOT.
http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: