15 Aug
2007
15 Aug
'07
1:58 a.m.
also sprach Charles Marcus <CMarcus@Media-Brokers.com> [2007.08.14.2028 +0200]:
Well, the whole point of sieve, I believe, is to make it something that an admin would want to let arbitrary users modify on their own recognizance, and the ability to specify arbitrary programs to run would be just *asking* to be hacked.
Wouldn't a decent, secure alternative to procmail be sieve+amavisd-new?
Except it's not really possible to make amavisd-new do per-user spam filtering. And it's even more of a performance hog.
-- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
"all language designers are arrogant. goes with the territory..." -- larry wall
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net