6 Nov
2012
6 Nov
'12
8 p.m.
At 4PM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Stephan Bosch) wrote:
Op 11/6/2012 1:43 PM, Ben Morrow schreef:
You want 'ereject', RFC 5429, but Pigeonhole currently only implements it as a synonym for reject. I'm not sure if this is within-spec or not: this paragraph
The "ereject" action MUST NOT be available in environments that do not support protocol-level rejection, e.g., an MUA, and MUST be available in all other environments that support the "reject" action.makes me think that perhaps it's not; in any case, Dovecot's implementation won't do what you want.
That feature is under development, and such features aren't compiled unless people add `--with-unfinished-features' to their configure line. So, don't worry, Pigeonhole does not normally violate the specification in this regard.
Oh, cool, I missed that on my quick look through the source.
Ben