-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2010-03-05 07:49, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:45 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2010, at 22.59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Do you think I'd break a lot of people's filters if I removed the prefix? :) Anyone strongly for/against removing it? It seems kind of annoying to me whenever I happen to think about it.
Well, it's beginning to sound like there are non-filtering reasons why the prefix can be good. So I guess it's better to keep things the way they are now :)
I don't recall any, other than plain refusal to use a dedicated folder, rather than dumping it all into the Inbox...
IMO, Michael M. Slusarz had a valid reason:
"[...] a common situation (at least for me) is someone who replies directly to your message from a list instead of to the list address. This will most likely cause that message to end up in your INBOX rather than being filtered into the appropriate mailing list mailbox. Having the list name in the Subject can be useful to visually filter these incoming messages in your INBOX, rather than potentially deleting/marking as spam since often times you may not recognize the sender."
I'm ok with both ways, but given that there is a considerable amount of opposition, I think Timo's decision to keep it as it is will work best.
Patrick.
STAR Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. http://www.star-group.net/ Phone: +86 (21) 3462 7688 x 826 Fax: +86 (21) 3462 7779
PGP key E883A005 https://stshacom1.star-china.net/keys/patrick_nagel.asc Fingerprint: E09A D65E 855F B334 E5C3 5386 EF23 20FC E883 A005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuQnlIACgkQ7yMg/OiDoAXXZwCffZWVAYq4sYp8LIaCsaOtL/Bc /n8AniFyZx68KfWAgrdUGGST/97UGsW3 =pG8R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----