Re: [Dovecot] PAM, NSS, and a new blocking=yes setting

Timo Sirainen wrote:

This blocking=yes will probably work great with NSS. With PAM I'm not so sure. Mostly because the worker never exits, it just does one PAM auth

Timo, can you clarify this a little more about why you're not sure? By that I mean for those of us using PAM and nss_ldap, what's our risk level going from rc22 to rc23 and chances something may blow up in our face by accident?

This seems like a fairly substantial change to be making to a code branch that's in RC status, but I guess that's how the cookie crumbles. :)

thanks, -te

-- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid Inc. | http://www.fluid.com