El Miércoles, 2 de Julio de 2008 a las 13:50, Charles Marcus escribió:
On 7/2/2008, Mark Zealey (Mark.Zealey@webfusion.com) wrote:
This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer
Wow... good idea for disclaimers (I hate them)...
IANAL, but: It's not only that we all hate them; also they are questionable in a legal point of view. They are based on:
- "It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender"
Yeah; I got the message, so I'm the addresee. No point here. And my telephatic powers are down now, so I can't know if it's been an error or not.
- " delete this message from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any reliance upon its contents"
Well, you sent it to me, so it's mine now. Sending a message to me doesn't give you the power to tell me what should I do; otherwise, I could say something like "send me all the files in your hard disk so I can verify you save no copy of this messages" or even "send me 1000$".
- Confidentially
Under spanish law, I have to SIGN a contract BEFORE I access to the confidential content. No contract, no confidentially. They can not show me some content and, later, tell me it was confidential.
Some interesting articles about this:
in spanish: http://www.iabogado.com/esp/blogcfm/1/2007/12/Los-avisos-de-confidencialidad...
in english: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
And yes, I'm really tired of this messages...
Aaaaaaaaaagur.
Joseba Torre. CIDIR Bizkaia.