On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:48:57PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On to, 2010-06-10 at 18:18 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
See this thread: http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/2010-May/001076.htm...
I've read it but I still don't get the point :
I thought "hidden = no" would advertise this namespace for clients which support NAMESPACE and that "list = yes" would allow clients which don't support NAMESPACE to access this namespace ?
What's wrong with that ?
The point of that thread was: With list=yes the client already can access the mailboxes in it without knowing anything about namespaces, so listing it also in namespaces is pointless.
The thread you pointed insisted on the fact that the list "" * command should not cross namespaces boudaries. So how can a client list mailboxes of a namespace if it doesn't discover the namespace name first ?
That's why I thought :
. a modern client which supports NAMESPACE, will discover the namespace name (hidden=no) and list it's content (list=yes).
. an old or bad client which doesn't support NAMESPACE will have to have the namespace(s) hard-coded in its' config
But maybe you mean that dovecot list the namespace content anyway if list = yes without having the need for the client to know anything about the namespace ? In that case, wouldn't it break the "list don't cross namespace boundaries" ?
-- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel@pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau