28 Oct
2009
28 Oct
'09
8:26 p.m.
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:43 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
however. The intention of this check within the vacation action is to prevent spurious vacation responses to for example Bcc:'ed deliveries (and perhaps multi-drop aliases).
But _why_ is BCC spurious? There are spurious BCC, but not in general. If I BCC a message to somebody, I want to know an out-of-office state. Just like for any CC or TO recipient.
At least one problem is email lists created using aliases. Like everyone@company.com.