Am 19.09.2012 16:25, schrieb Jost Krieger:
On Wed 19 Sep 2012 04:03:45 PM GMT, Robert Schetterer wrote:
as ever ,this is different in different places specially Quarantine is wide used
Of course, it's often useful.
there is no good or evil to this case, its a design question which may change in different places,, the abuse case might be acceptable, as the Junk folder i.e is imap special used autoconfigured and has auto empty feature, i give 50 mb plus quota on Junk folder and delete mail older then 3 month there
The abuse may be tolerable, but I just don't get how your +50M works.
the situation isnt really comparable, the plus is more configured for copy by human to i.e Junk folder, or i.e a client filter does this auto
it makes most sense with trash, so user should mostly able to copy to trash, even if they have got full quota, this should avoid some errors in clients
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration ... quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M quota_rule3 = SPAM:ignore ...
For me it would mean that someone with a large Junk folder just wouldn't get an more mail except something delivered straight to Junk. And if you don't deliver to Junk but the clients move stuff there,
with auto loosing mail after some time in my setup which is the anounced policy, Trash and Junk are "autodeleted" folders no mail there ,rests forever *g
there's still a
problem. I'm justing raising the limit for folders that clients use for deleting (like Trash or whatever it is called).
as i said its a design question, your policy is ok too
no flame ,having your idea as alternative is always fine to have
Yours Jost Krieger
-- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer