-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
4 getacl INBOX
- ACL "INBOX" "user" "testusr" lrwstipekxacd 4 OK Getacl completed.
But yeah, it clearly can't just return emptyness there. Wonder if it could return "" or something. I'll look into this tomorrow, unless someone already can tell me the right way to handle this.
Digging a second time through RFC4314 I found this:
The first example in Sec 2.1.1
" S: * LISTRIGHTS archive/imap anyone "" lr s w i p k x t c d "
In conjunction with Sec 3.7
"Following the identifier is a string containing the (possibly empty) set of rights the identifier will always be granted in the mailbox."
So "" for an empty set is needed.
=====
Now I wonder, why there exists "an empty set of rights" at all?
Shouldn't "SETACL mailbox id" (no rights string) behave differently than "DELETEACL mailbox id" then as well? Currently it removes the ACL entry of id.
Reading the RFC I get the impression, that SETACL should have three arguments always.
Bye,
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBSjdbXnWSIuGy1ktrAQI8QAf9GheGY8S1iUl6dyvFTRcDq7b1dROmC4DT ipNvezqUyG8p6sK3gljsO0DdauDmzMmZoPao31ZyvFGSNZkaN/c3tVpui4qYLYhx exVXEajNyONdsVDWyvEAooVWATEC7rTVRWqLCpF3g3kxQcAtz0VZlG/JSwBr3VbP 7y0tPIQBsJvPaLdLEQ8I30myEIlNZbSgP7v/bcngsq0xZF6HHXqJdf4jyBLrO26R JzWTYnN1i/dZGEPM8NIsmr+ZqTSfwkHTasO6QTzPo/CWv8ZlXkTNWNnwsatTmxFm E+NnZZ90S7pbm/2FXoXplzRiHdxrn/6l0uaQUY9mR0Kb/76hMXU4aA== =H8ZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----