I'd like to give a feedback on the issue I was struggling with.
The online configuration converter helped me to sort out any remaining problems after manual adjustments. The permission problems probably arised because passwd wasn't defined properly and hence I guess it couldn't properly attach uid to a given user. Now that the config has been properly converted, things are running fine.
Thank you Aki for the online converter: it was quite useful. Pointed out some things I missed after reading documents.
Bugless conding: Dw.
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
2026.Január 26.(H) 12:01 időpontban Aki Tuomi ezt írta:
Again, to reiterate once more in this thread, 2.4 **is** major release.
The versioning scheme is generation.major.minor.patch, so 2.4.0.0 is the full version number for 2.4.0, we just drop the last .0 as it's not really a patch release.
Aki
On 26/01/2026 12:59 EET "Tóth Attila" via dovecot <dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
I was reading documentation and converting my config step-by-step. There were a bunch of error messages to sort out. Most of them I could, but there are permission issues preventing the upgrade. I'm not an IT illiterate and maintaining servers for 20+ years. But this one gives me headaches. Again: I did RTFM. There was a recent post by Curtis, so my problems may be syntax related after all and not about permissions in any way.
So despite of reading release announcements and all sorts of documentations, it is still not straightforward. And I am not the only one according to the list.
I go with Marek. These changes would have provided enough a reason for a major version bump, not from 2.3 to 2.4. And it would have been good to indicate deprecated configuration options before or provide config backward compatibility or conversion. Not to break nearly every config as it was.
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
2026.Január 25.(V) 12:54 időpontban Washington Odhiambo via dovecot ezt írta:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 2:47PM Marek Gresko via dovecot <[1]dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
Hello, it may be true the change was announced long time before, but me personally also did not notice and was quite surprised. If thereis such a big compatibility change I would expoect major version number change (3.0) not a minor (2.4) which evokes some higher progress but not the configuration compatibility change.
I would also expect on such change if the software accepts alsoold config for some time and logs about deprecated config. Just to get prepared. I accept there could be reasons which did not allow authors to do it like that.
MarekEvery major release or point release always comes with a Release Announcement and if there are any breaking changes, they are always listed. Your expectations as stated are personal. The developers just do their thing as always. Before any upgrade/update, always refer to the Release Announcement!
Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' -\_(Tu)_/- :-) [How to ask smart questions: [2]http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]
References
Visible links
- mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org
- http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave@dovecot.org
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave@dovecot.org