Doesn't it currently confuse them? Because they'd reach their quota, while actually there would be a lot of disk space left :) + their whole mailbox could take a lot more space due to indexes and other files in the filesystem, and quota would not be reached.
Also, I've dovecot is using fstat's st_size parameter. This is not "correct", in that the actual space used on disk is always higher.
If we count the number of 512B blocks used (st_blocks), and multiply by 512 to get the true disk usage.
I'll be looking forward for your feedback/ideas.
Thank you!
-- Best regards, Martynas Bendorius
On 2020-02-08, at 17:57, Max Kostikov max@kostikov.co wrote:
I think these changes will confuse users because calculated quota wouldn't be equals with total messages sizes.
Marsistynas Bendorius писал 2020-02-07 11:07:
Is there any reason why dovecot relies on S= instead of real disk size email takes? there, including indexes and mails without S=... if we'd read
- compressed mails take less than than the S= specified
- we could avoid using "S=" for the lookups and count every file
filesizes
-- With best regards, Max Kostikov
W: https://kostikov.co | DeltaChat: mk@eprove.net