Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> wrote Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:23:59 +0200:
| On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 17:15 +1300, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
| > > Does anybody use the combination dovecot 1.0 alpha5 and dovecot-lda
| > > 0.1 with success or would you recommend running -lda from CVS? If so,
| >
| > I'm usually synced up to both in CVS (non critical machine) and at the moment it
| > works OK. I doubt you'd have problems mixing dovecot-lda CVS with anything
| > remotely recent but you should ideally run latest alpha release (or CVS if you
| > track the changes) of dovecot also.
|
| Current dovecot-lda can use dovecot.conf nowadays, and requires a
| "protocol lda" section in dovecot.conf. That however gives config
| parsing error with anything but latest Dovecot CVS.. You could of course
| make dovecot-lda use a separate config file.
Thanks, both of you, for good info. I'll go for current CVS for both dovecot and -lda.
(Attached is a small patch for compiling dovecot-lda on systems with com_err.h directly in /usr/include. Should patches go elsewhere?)
-- Linus