12 Aug
2008
12 Aug
'08
1:49 p.m.
On 8/12/2008, Josef Liaka (jl@chl.cz) wrote:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in my opinion undesirable,
It is not only desirable, as Stephan already pointed out to someone else, it is per the spec:
"This behavior is implemented as such on purpose. From RFC5230 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5230.txt):
5.1. SMTP MAIL FROM Address
The SMTP MAIL FROM address of the message envelope SHOULD be set to
<>. [...]"
> because many vacation messages are caught in spam filters.
So what? Many people consider them spam already.
Please don't muck with things like this unless you have a really, really good reason...
--
Best regards,
Charles