11 Oct
2004
11 Oct
'04
12:54 p.m.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 11:27 +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
Why is this an option? Is there a reason why someone would want to disable this workaround? Like Timo said: but I thought I'd require all workarounds to be explicitly enabled so future client implementors can make sure their clients work without any of them.
System adminstrators have no reason to switch off a workaround in Dovecot because a bug was fixed in a certain revision of an IMAP client, and Microsoft doesn't need Dovecot to fix this bug.
Don't mean to sound pragmatic, but why make it an option?
-- Andreas Aardal Hanssen http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg2