21 Nov
2009
21 Nov
'09
12:58 a.m.
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:43 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
From RFC 5530[3]:
NONEXISTENT
The operation attempts to delete something that does not exist.
NONEXISTENT should be used for RENAME or DELETE (also the UID EXPUNGE)
commands.
Well, that sucks.. I'll ask Arnt if he had an actual reason for the above text, but I suppose I'll anyway have to modify Dovecot to internally separate between NONEXISTENT and NONEXISTENT_DELETE or something.