I suppose the OP does not sort by date but Arrival time (this means arrival time in the mailbox).
Exactly. I sort by arrival time, which in practice is the "unsorted" ordering based upon the mbox file itself. (Except I'd like to control the arbitrary "unsorted" order that I want by "resave to inbox" to handle reordering.)
Nicolas wrote:
- a quick grep shows this is 'normal' behaviour, as written in src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-save.c
if (mbox->mbox_lock_type == F_RDLCK) { /* FIXME: we shouldn't fail here. it's just a locking issue that should be possible to fix.. */ mail_storage_set_error(storage, MAIL_ERROR_NOTPOSSIBLE, "Can't copy mails inside same mailbox"); return -1; }
So I'm currently using: mbox_write_locks: fcntl When I was using version 9 the relevant config setting was: "mbox_locks = fcntl", which plus the config suggestion "fcntl: Use this if possible" led me down this path.
Does anybody know why this code was designed this way / why it is different from 0.99 behavior / etc?
Jonathan
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/