-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 11:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
Shouldn't that be more like:
reject "this guy is gone"; keep;
Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in which the replacement guy would still access the leaving guy's mailbox.
They felt that just deactivating the mailbox and rejecting mails would be "rude".
Ah, but that's why I had the "keep" there! The reject message of course could have been nicer and said how the guy is gone but this address will be read for a bit longer but anyway stop sending mail here.
Oh... yeah. I never got past the "reject", I guess ;) That would probably be a good solution. Does 'reject' also refrain from sending mails to mailing lists, auto-generated messages, etc., like 'vacation' does?
Patrick.
STAR Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. http://www.star-group.net/ Phone: +86 (21) 3462 7688 x 826 Fax: +86 (21) 3462 7779
PGP key E883A005 https://stshacom1.star-china.net/keys/patrick_nagel.asc Fingerprint: E09A D65E 855F B334 E5C3 5386 EF23 20FC E883 A005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAksLXMQACgkQ7yMg/OiDoAWaZgCguKuzYmEzUBhxMC1C2XzB/WLy gJEAniwNr1m195qxpsIkxl2jNN5HLMsO =nS3d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----