17 Oct
2006
17 Oct
'06
11:44 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:27:39PM +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 15:48 +0200, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
find /path -name dovecot.index.\* | xargs rm
find /path -name 'dovecot.index.*' -exec rm {} \;
The version with xargs is much more efficient on a large file store. The second version forks a separate rm process for each file.
xargs forks the minimum number of rm processes required by the shell.
No, it fires an rm process for each 5000 files (by default, change with find -n). I don't know which is more efficient though. Anyway, thinking about it will take more time than running either command. :-)
Geert