On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Noel Butler wrote:
*sigh*
As usual Stanley, you do not contribute anything constructive, only trollish jibberish
I don't know where both of you live, but can't you just grab a coffee and find out what it is that makes a mockery of any discussion between the two of you? Or why you can't seem to get along? Make sure the coffee isn't too hot so you can at least throw it at one another without getting any lawyer involved :-P
How hard would it be to just not feed the trolls, if you're so convinced Stan is one. He's not even trying to get on your nerves, and yet you take it personal.
I could have gone and *sigh* about Hadmuts not-so-polite last reply a few days ago, but I figured that wouldn't have helped anyone. Probably not even my ego.
Back on topic: there sems to be an issue that doesn't handle temporary failures properly (i.e., it should at least record the details of the failure in some logs). This may very well be related to a locally built Dovecot, or being unfamiliar with Postfix/Dovecot configuration, or both. You could try something like 'su' or 'sudo' to break the transactions into separate parts, to see what's generating the tempfail and why. Maybe we're missing some log entries right above the quoted postfix tempfail, that shows some non-null exit code.
-- Maarten