13 Feb
2007
13 Feb
'07
12:07 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 19:18 -0800, Troy Engel wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
This blocking=yes will probably work great with NSS. With PAM I'm not so sure. Mostly because the worker never exits, it just does one PAM auth
Timo, can you clarify this a little more about why you're not sure?
Because it's the different PAM plugins that can break.
By that I mean for those of us using PAM and nss_ldap, what's our risk level going from rc22 to rc23 and chances something may blow up in our face by accident?
There's no risk, because the default behavior didn't change.