15 Aug
2009
15 Aug
'09
12:18 a.m.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 17:06 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (tss@iki.fi) wrote:
Hard links would be the simplest implementation without needing a separate database. Sure you could implement that too if you wanted to.
So... support hard links natively (on FS that support them), then allow for supporting other backend storage implementations with plugins... ?
Well, I'm not going to implement either anytime soon. So depends on whoever happens to want this feature enough to actually code it. :)