On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 17:51, schrieb Jochen Bern:
So the specific *LEGAL REQUIREMENTS* I gave as an example don't apply to your servers/organization/country/whatever? Good for you. Now how about we wait for Dmitry to tell us whether or not *he* needs the solution to *his* problem to address such scenarios?
which legal requirements?
Legal requirements like, for example, these German ones: http://www.recht-im-internet.de/themen/archivierung.htm Note that the legalese addresses users acting in the name of a company, *regardless* of what infrastructure they're using to do so.
user of domain1.example.com must not use the MTA of domain2.example.com for sending mails with his domain1.example.com
user of domain2.example.com must not use the MTA of domain1.example.com for sending mails with his domain2.example.com
there is nothing between - period
I asked Dmitry whether users of his domain1 picking up the habit of sending e-mail (on domain1 matters) through some domain2 - in a way that's perfectly acceptable on the *technical* plane you're so obsessed about - and thus bypassing the automatic copy he's trying to set up on domain1's servers is a development he can accept. For me, it would *not* be, for reasons that are non-technical but nonetheless binding.
Regards, J. Bern
*NEU* - NEC IT-Infrastruktur-Produkte im <http://www.linworks-shop.de/>: Server--Storage--Virtualisierung--Management SW--Passion for Performance Jochen Bern, Systemingenieur --- LINworks GmbH <http://www.LINworks.de/> Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt | Robert-Koch-Str. 9, 64331 Weiterstadt PGP (1024D/4096g) FP = D18B 41B1 16C0 11BA 7F8C DCF7 E1D5 FAF4 444E 1C27 Tel. +49 6151 9067-231, Zentr. -0, Fax -299 - Amtsg. Darmstadt HRB 85202 Unternehmenssitz Weiterstadt, Geschäftsführer Metin Dogan, Oliver Michel