21 Mar
2007
21 Mar
'07
8:07 p.m.
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:52 -0700, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:
Dirsize was never meant to be used with maildir. Why do you want to
use it instead of maildir++ quota?We'd like to use maildir++ in the future, but haven't tested it yet
with our MTA (which uses "dirsize"-like summing). We realize
"dirsize is a really bad idea with maildirs" so don't prefer it, but
it's been working OK in the meantime. If it could just enable
tagging appended files too, it might at least be an option for maildir?
I just fear that if I do that, some people would actually use maildir +dirsize combination without realizing how horribly slow it is..