Dan Price wrote:
I agree except for my aformentioned concerns: if 1.0.1 is a bugfix release for 1.0, great. But I'd not like 1.0.1 to be chock full of new features which could introduce instability.
I'd like to see a risk managed, bug-fix-only 1.0.x train and a less stable 1.1 or 2.x train.
I concur with Dan, 1.0.x bugfix + 1.1 devel. Stability is more key to us rather than new features - if it wasn't for the namespace needs I'd probably be using 0.99 as that's what's in the RHEL release.
But I also concur with Marc, let's lock it down and ship it if we're pretty darn bug free. :) My beta testers love it, it's night and day compared to Courier re: performance. They don't know what 'Dovecot' is, but they know it rocks.
-te
-- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid Inc. | http://www.fluid.com