2 Mar
2007
2 Mar
'07
10:20 a.m.
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:22 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I think the documentation should be in plaintext.
Agreed.
Glad to see I'm not the only person here who likes to be able to read the docs with "more".
I'm not averse to the idea of one of the "structured text" variants, but mostly because the good ones are designed to look like plain text documentation.
-- Curtis Maloney cmaloney@cardgate.net