Another data point; after reverting, I kept getting the same (new)
assert failures from below, and again the dovecot server wrote a
bunch of NULs (this time a couple thousand) to the end of the mbox file.
I'm back on UW-IMAP for the moment, but would like to go ahead and
continue to help test and troubleshoot this bug.
-dalvenjah
On Oct 26, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Dalvenjah FoxFire wrote:
It got a bit weirder with this patch. It no longer crashed, but I
got a different assert error, and a slight (fixable) corruption bug:Oct 26 12:22:16 dragonlair dovecot: imap-login: Login:
user=<dalvenja>, method=PLAIN, rip=X.X.X.X, lip=X.X.X.X, TLS Oct 26 12:22:16 dragonlair dovecot: IMAP(dalvenja): L466 count: 0
last_seq: 22025 first_seq: 22025 Oct 26 12:22:16 dragonlair dovecot: IMAP(dalvenja): file mbox-sync- rewrite.c: line 468 (mbox_sync_rewrite): assertion failed: (count
== last_seq - first_seq + 1) Oct 26 12:22:16 dragonlair dovecot: child 20995 (imap) killed with
signal 6 [...] Oct 26 12:24:32 dragonlair dovecot: imap-login: Login:
user=<dalvenja>, method=PLAIN, rip=X.X.X.X, lip=X.X.X.X, TLS Oct 26 12:24:37 dragonlair dovecot: IMAP(dalvenja): L466 count: 0
last_seq: 6370 first_seq: 6365 Oct 26 12:24:37 dragonlair dovecot: IMAP(dalvenja): file mbox-sync- rewrite.c: line 468 (mbox_sync_rewrite): assertion failed: (count
== last_seq - first_seq + 1) Oct 26 12:24:37 dragonlair dovecot: child 21132 (imap) killed with
signal 6(the L466 line was added by me to print out the values for the
assert variables)This happened with two different mbox files.
The weirder part (the corruption bug) was that every time dovecot
wrote the mbox file, it added between 280 and 320 NUL (ascii 0)
characters at the end of the last message; so the next message to
get appended by procmail started its 'From ' header on a "line"
with NUL characters, and that message would not get recognized on
the next check. I found this had happened a total of 3 times to the
mbox file.I was able to clean the NULs out of the mbox file, but I've again
reverted back to the raw rc10 code for now.Do you want me to try debugging with just the first patch and try
to find where the core dump occurs?Let me know -- thanks!
-dalvenjah
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 00:38 -0700, Dalvenjah FoxFire wrote:
Same here -- segfaults with the patch. I tried an strace on the
child imap processes, but keep getting permission denied (even as root). I turned on debugging but no luck. I went ahead and reverted to the code from before the patch.Wonder why I didn't get it to crash. Anyway, this should fix it:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2006-October/006634.html