On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:02 +0200, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 15:38 +0200, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
Representing the low-end.. ;)
Hah. I have you beat.
No chance - your P2 is very likely faster than my Via EDEN.. 8^1
Is that it.. hmm too easy ;)
RAM: 320MB
However, I admit that your RAM beats mine. ;)
jeroen@purgatory:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 7 processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 5 model : 2 model name : Pentium 75 - 200 stepping : 5 cpu MHz : 99.727
jeroen@purgatory:~$ cat /proc/meminfo | head -n 1
MemTotal: 125860 kB
Thus: Server: DEC Intel Multia (Single Intel Pentium 100) RAM: 128MB (couldn't find more SIMM's :) OS: Debian unstable Number of Users: 7 IMAP of which 4 clients checking mail near 24/7 Auth: PAM Mailbox size: 2Gb Maildir / ~1000 new mails/day Storage: Toshiba 20Gb 2.5" IDE Version: 1.0.beta3-3 (debian unstable) Clients: Evolution (debian unstable) & Thunderbird on Windows. Connectivity: IPv6 (used mostly ;) and IPv4
And that box does a lot of other tasks making it very heavy. But as dovecot is super-fast it runs perfectly fine on such a box. (http://unfix.org/~jeroen/network/ ;) for a funnier fact, when this box had some disk issues a couple of weeks ago I used one of the Linksys NSLU2's in the list on the mentioned url for dovecot access. Those are ARM 266mhz's with only 32mb of mem and even *that* works fine.
Thanks to Ytti for pointing out at the time that dovecot was the best IMAP server, which IMHO it is ;)
A lot of kudo's and repect to Timo for such a great product (+s, as irssi is also great ;) !!!
Greets, Jeroen