29 Nov
2004
29 Nov
'04
5:28 p.m.
Timo Sirainen said:
I've also been thinking about if I should switch from CVS to Darcs. It seems to be exactly the kind of reversion control tool I had wanted to use. Anyone have comments for or against it? I'd still have read-only CVS repository generated from it, although I couldn't yet find a way to do it.
There's been an extensive thread/review of it on the gnu-arch mailing list, but of course as one of the competitors we (on that mailing list) rather view darcs as a competitor. I've come out of that with the conclusion that while a really nice tool to use, darcs is too much a memory hog for me to use.
That said, here's the obvious: be sure to investigate gnu arch, whether it is as tla or baz (bazaar).
johannes